SUBSCRIBE

Breaking News on Confectionery & Biscuit Processing

News > Manufacturers

Read more breaking news

 

 

KitKat UK trademark rejected on appeal

Post a comment

By Oliver Nieburg+

17-May-2017
Last updated on 18-May-2017 at 15:26 GMT2017-05-18T15:26:17Z

Nestlé 'considering next steps' after Court of Appeal rejects KitKat shape mark. ©iStock/robtek
Nestlé 'considering next steps' after Court of Appeal rejects KitKat shape mark. ©iStock/robtek

Nestlé has lost its bid to register the four-finger KitKat has a 3D shape mark in the UK after a ruling in the Court of Appeal today.

The court followed an earlier judgement by the High Court and rejected Nestlé’s appeal – ruling in favor of Cadbury owner Mondelēz International.

Nestlé has a right to appeal the case to the UK Supreme Court.

Nestlé dissapointed by decision

A spokesperson for the KitKat maker said the company was dissapointed and was "considering its next steps".

“This judgment does not mean that our four finger-shape is now free for use in the UK or elsewhere. KitKat is much loved around the world and its four finger-shape is well-known by consumers.

"Nestlé’s four finger-shapes has been granted trademark registration in many countries of the world, for instance Germany, France, Australia, South Africa and Canada, further protecting it from imitations”.

Mondelēz welcomes the judgement

The Court of Appeal said the KitKat shape alone – without branding – had failed to gain distinctiveness to be registered as a shape mark.

Nestlé first applied to register the mark in 2010, but was later opposed by Cadbury UK, now a subsidiary of Mondelēz International.

A Mondelēz spokesperson said: “We are pleased with the Court of Appeal’s decision today and welcome their conclusion. As we have previously stated, we do not believe the shape of the KitKat bar should be protected as a trade mark in the UK.”

Lawyers' view

Sally Britton, intellectual property lawyer at Mishcon de Reya, said: "The court's decision sets a high bar for the registration of shape marks.

"This case is interesting as it examines the type of use and consumer recognition required to obtain monopoly protection over a shape mark. Businesses seeking to protect non-traditional trade marks such as shapes or packaging will need to provide evidence that consumers are relying on that trade mark to identify the origin of the product." 

Kate Swaine, a partner at Gowling WLG, said:"While the Court of Appeal acknowledged that the shape of the KitKat is well-known, the court was not convinced that the shape of the bar alone would indicate to consumers the source of the product.

"In fact the Court found that Nestlé itself had never sought to promote KitKats by only referring to the shape. The case is being watched by many brand owners with interest as a trade mark is a valuable form of protection that could extend their monopoly over the appearance of their products. However this result reaffirms the real challenge facing anyone seeking to protect the shape of a product with a trade mark." 

Post a comment

Comment title *
Your comment *
Your name *
Your email *

We will not publish your email on the site

I agree to Terms and Conditions

These comments have not been moderated. You are encouraged to participate with comments that are relevant to our news stories. You should not post comments that are abusive, threatening, defamatory, misleading or invasive of privacy. For the full terms and conditions for commenting see clause 7 of our Terms and Conditions ‘Participating in Online Communities’. These terms may be updated from time to time, so please read them before posting a comment. Any comment that violates these terms may be removed in its entirety as we do not edit comments. If you wish to complain about a comment please use the "REPORT ABUSE" button or contact the editors.

Key Industry Events

 

Access all events listing

Our events, Shows & Conferences...