Special edition: Cutting calories in confectionery

Reduced or no sugar SKUs help confectioners cut calories without risk

By Oliver Nieburg contact

- Last updated on GMT

Adding a reduced or no sugar brand extension allows confectioners to test the market before removing a higher calorie product, says Cargill
Adding a reduced or no sugar brand extension allows confectioners to test the market before removing a higher calorie product, says Cargill

Related tags: Sugar, Confectionery, Sugar substitute, Sweeteners

Manufacturers can create reduced or no sugar hard and soft candy product extensions without the risk of changing the taste of a proven seller through reformulation, according to Cargill.

Cargill’s senior application specialist for sugar confectionery, Jan Delobel, told ConfectioneryNews that replacing sugar in full or in part with polyols was the simplest way to cut calories.

However, he said that this would inevitably change the taste and it was therefore better to launch the reformulated product as a brand extension and wait for it to grow before removing the sucrose-sweetened version.

“They perform just as well and sometimes better than the sugar based ones,”​ he said.

Reduced sugar SKU

The tactic has been employed by Ricola, which has a 30% reduced sugar candy to complement its traditional sucrose-sweetened hard candy.

According to market analysts Innova, there were 3,702 SKUs launched in non-chocolate confectionery in Europe in 2013, up 18% on the previous year.

Of the 2013 SKU launches, 22% made a low calorie, no added sugar or sugar free claim.

ricola sugar free
Ricola has a stevia-sweetened version of its Original brand to complement the sucrose version.

Under pressure to reduce sugar

Delobel said that pressure was building on sugar confectioners to reduce calories. “Retailers in England are asking manufacturers to reduce the amount of sugar,” ​he said.

Under the UK government’s Public Responsibility Deal, leading confectioners such as Mondelēz and Nestlé have signed up to a 250 kcal cap on single-serve confectionery items.

Calorie content in hard and soft candies varies widely. A 125 g bag of Beauty Sweeties for example is sweetened with sucrose and contains 333 kcal per 100g – that represents 17% of an adult woman’s recommended daily calorie intake under the UK Food Standards Agency’s guidelines.

Delobel said that the serving size for a single candy can sometimes be 2-5  g. “You can put your hand in the bag a few times and it’s empty. It adds very quickly to your intake of calories.”

innova - Confectionery (no chocolate), Europe, January 2012 – November 2014 – 2235 SKU
Non-chocolate confectionery launches in Europe (January 2012 – November 2014). Source: Innova

Consider polyols

Candy manufacturers can reduce calories by replacing sucrose in part or in full, or by opting for a lower calorie gelling agent.

Delobel said the simplest way to reduce calories while sticking with sucrose was to partially replace sugar with polyols.

“Sucrose is not normally allowed together with polyols but if it has functionality it is allowed.”

Under EU regulations​, polyols and sucrose can be combined in hard and soft candies if the product qualifies for a ‘reduced calories’ claim.

Reduced calorie but a different taste

Delobel said that a manufacturer could make a jelly with sugar and glucose, but replace the sugar coating with erythritol to realize a 30% sugar reduction - enough to meet the threshold for a reduced calorie claim.

Sugar contains 4 kcal per gram compared to 2.4 kcal for polyols, while erythritol is 0.2 kcal per gram.

“It would taste differently because erythritol has a cooling effect. It doesn’t mean it tastes worse – it could be considered a freshener for your mouth,”​ said Delobel.

The R&D specialist said that bulking agents would be required to compensate for the loss of sugar. He said isomalt was the preferred option for hard candies, while maltitol was best-suited for gums and jellies.

Stevia bandwagon

Läkerol-Stevia-220x320

Cargill’s marketing manager for health and nutrition, Caroline Chabot, added that manufacturers were jumping on high intensity sweetener stevia.

For example, Cloetta recently launched a stevia-sweetened version of its throat lozenge brand Läkerol, which combines stevia, maltitol and sorbitol. Each 1-2 g pastille contains 2 kcal.

Perfetti Van Melle also added a new product line to its licorice brand Klene, which combines stevia and maltitol. The product features a stevia leaf front of pack.

Stevia contains no calories, but caloric bulking sweeteners are required. Manufacturers are not permitted to blend stevia with sucrose under EU regulations. 

Related topics: Ingredients, Candy, Health & Functionality

Related news

Show more

Related products

show more

Let’s create your next special chocolate moment

Let’s create your next special chocolate moment

AAK - the first choice for value-adding vegetable oil solutions | 18-Jan-2019 | Product Brochure

The premium chocolate market is forecasted to grow three times faster than the standard chocolate segment. In addition, consumers are increasingly focused...

Matrix Particle Technology for longer lasting gum

Matrix Particle Technology for longer lasting gum

TasteTech Encapsulation Solutions | 08-Oct-2018 | Application Note

In this study TasteTech investigate the effectiveness of encapsulation technology on the optimisation of taste perception within chewing gum.
It...

Accelerate your supply chain as pressures intensify

Accelerate your supply chain as pressures intensify

William Reed | 01-Oct-2018 | Technical / White Paper

Food, Drink and Non-Food manufacturers are under pressure. Range reviews, massive retail mergers, the backlash against plastic packaging and the ongoing...

Related suppliers

Follow us

Featured Events

View more

Products

View more

Webinars