Roshen and United Confectioners both lose out in ‘Crab’ vs ‘Crayfish’ candy trademark row

By Oliver Nieburg contact

- Last updated on GMT

Roshen's caramel 'Crabs' (left) do not infringe United Confectioners IP rights for 'sweetmeats' (right) rules court. Photos: Court papers
Roshen's caramel 'Crabs' (left) do not infringe United Confectioners IP rights for 'sweetmeats' (right) rules court. Photos: Court papers

Related tags: Appeal, Russia, United states, Roshen

United Confectioners’ Red October Factory and Ukranian frim Roshen have each been ordered to pay costs after failing in EU trademark appeals concerning whether a crab design resembled a crayfish design.

Moscow Confectionery Factory ‘Krasnyiy oktyabr’ - a subsidiary of part-Russian state owned group United Confectioners - has been contesting Roshen’s ‘Crabs’ trademark registration for four years.

In 2013, Roshen filed two applications to trademark a red, yellow and white design for a brand named Crabs, for confectionery, caramels and candy: One horiztonal design and another with a vertical line of crabs.

Red October filed opposition to both trademarks a year later. It claimed Roshen’s proposed marks infringed its own mark for “sweetmeats [candy]” registered in 2011, which features a crayfish design in red, white and black.

crab vertical
Roshen vertical crabs design. Photo: Court papers

Low likelihood of confusion, says EU court

The Opposition Division of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) rejected Red October's opposition to both Roshen trademarks in 2015.

Red October then appealed to the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO. Its claim against Roshen's horizontal crab design was dismissed, but the appeal court accepted its claim against Roshen's verticals crabs design and annuled the mark.

Red October again appealed the decision regarding the horizontal crab design to The European General Court, while Roshen appealed the decision to annul the vertical crabs mark.

The European General Court yesterday upheld​ earlier rulings by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and dissmised both appeals.

The court said there was a low likelihood of confusion between Red October’s ‘sweetmeats’ mark and Roshen’s horizontal crab mark.

However, it upheld the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO's decision to annul the vertical crabs design mark.

United Confectioners was ordered to pay costs for its failed horizontal crab appeal, while Roshen was ordered to pay costs for its failed vertical crabs appeal.

Candy, trademarks and politics

Kiev-headquartered Roshen is owned by Ukrainian president Petro Poroshenko. He said he would sell the company if elected president, but a sale has not materialized.

Roshen axed 700 jobs at a factory in Liptesk​, Russia last year after Russian authorities froze Roshen assets​​​ in Russian banks and seized the factory in 2014.

It came amid another trademark lawsuit between Roshen and United Confectioners.

United Confectioners initiated legal proceedings against Roshen in 2010 for allegedly infringing its trademark on former Soviet brand “Lastochka”. An appeal court in 2012 ordered Roshen to pay RUB 212 million ($5.8m) and Roshen said it had stopped production of its Lastochka-Pevunya brand.

United Confectioners is the market leader in Russian chocolate confectionery with a 21% market share, while Roshen leads in chocolate in Ukraine with a 32% value share, according to Euromonitor International.

Related topics: Manufacturers, Chocolate, Emerging Markets

Related news

Show more

comments

Post your comment

We will not publish your email address on the website

These comments have not been moderated. You are encouraged to participate with comments that are relevant to our news stories. You should not post comments that are abusive, threatening, defamatory, misleading or invasive of privacy. For the full terms and conditions for commenting see clause 7 of our Terms and Conditions ‘Participating in Online Communities’. These terms may be updated from time to time, so please read them before posting a comment. Any comment that violates these terms may be removed in its entirety as we do not edit comments. If you wish to complain about a comment please use the "REPORT ABUSE" button or contact the editors.