Deal or no deal for public health? Action on Sugar pushes for confectionery promotions ban

By Oliver Nieburg contact

- Last updated on GMT

FDF cotends promotions help make food more affordable. ©GettyImages/Wavebreakmedia
FDF cotends promotions help make food more affordable. ©GettyImages/Wavebreakmedia

Related tags: Sugar, Nutrition, Confectionery

UK campaign group Action on Sugar is calling on the government to prohibit confectionery price promotions and to introduce a candy tax of at least 20%.

Industry trade body the Food and Drink Federation (FDF) argues promotions help make food more affordable and opposes any taxes demonizing certain product categories.

Share bags on offer

UK government policy

Uk election may - AlisaRut

Confectionery escaped a UK tax on sugary drinks​​​ introduced in 2016. However, UK government body Public Health England (PHE) last year issued voluntary health guidelines​ on portion sizes and sugar content in nine food categories, including confectionery. PHE recommended chocolate should contain a maximum of 43.7 g of sugar per 100 g by 2020.

Action on Sugar – formed in 2014​ by academics behind the Consensus Action on Salt and Health (CASH) – accused manufacturers of encouraging excessive sugar consumption by discounting confectionery share bags.

It pointed to a survey​ by our sister publication The Grocer in 2014, which found around a third of 16 to 24 year olds admit to eating a whole share bag alone.

The group said Tesco, Asda, Sainsbury’s, Morrisons, Co-op and Waitrose had price promotions on some sharing bags, sometimes for £1 ($1.43) per bag, between December 2017 and January 2018.

Action on Sugar: An incentive for innovation

Action on Sugar contends confectionery price promotions are contributing to high rates of obesity, type 2 diabetes and tooth decay in the UK.

It called on retailers to “act responsibly and no longer profit at the expense of our health”.

Kawther Hashem, of Action on Sugar, told ConfectioneryNews: “Retail promotions are designed to drive consumption.

“If we ban promotion of confectionery, we can create a strong incentive for both retailers and manufacturers to promote new and innovative products that are lower in sugar and calories – undoubtedly that will help consumers make healthier choices and have a balanced diet.”

sugar in sharebag action on sugar
Action on Sugar called out certain brands for sugar levels in share bags and noted others with lower sugar content. Photo: Action on Sugar

FDF response

An FDF spokesperson said: Research​ suggests that promotions are already a declining part of the marketing mix for most major UK retailers and HFSS (high fat, salt or sugar) foods do not make up the overwhelming proportion of such promotions.

“Retail promotions not only make food more affordable, they also allow established brands to promote new, innovative products and help challenger brands to get established.”

The NHS Scotland research​ to which FDF refers says: “While the number of promotions on healthy and unhealthy food and drinks appear to be equal, price promotions on unhealthy foods and drinks tend to offer a greater reduction in price or greater product volume for a set cost than promotions on healthy foods and drink, resulting in the uptake of promotions on unhealthy food and drink being much higher.”

A report​ by IRI suggests 61.9% of UK confectionery volumes were sold on promotion for the 52 weeks ending November 5, 2016, a decline of 2% on the prior year.

Confectionery's contribution to sugar intake

sugar sweet calories confectionery candy chocolate obesity piotr_malczyk

The UK’s National Diet and Nutrition Survey​​​ found chocolate confectionery accounted for 8% and sugar confectionery 6% of average daily non-milk extrinsic sugars (NMES) among children aged 11-18. Only fruit juice (10%) and non-low calorie soft drinks (29%) accounted for more.

UK c​andy tax

Action on Sugar argues confectionery is the second biggest contributor​ to sugar intake in children, after soft drinks. 

The group has renewed calls - first made in May last year​ - for the UK’s sugary drinks tax to be extended confectionery with a minimum 20% levy.

Action on Sugar’s Hashem said: “There is evidence that consumers are price-sensitive, so introducing a tax, can reduce excessive purchase.”

FDF’s spokesperson said the trade body opposes food taxes.

“There is no substantive evidence that they make any meaningful difference to obesity. 

“Instead of demonising individual nutrients, products or categories we should instead be promoting balanced diets,” ​they said.

Background reading..​.
​​Usual suspects: Confectionery may be next victim of national sugar taxes​​ (22-Mar-2016)
Tax on sugary drinks may be extended after review​​​ (28-Apr-2017)

Related news

Show more


Post your comment

We will not publish your email address on the website

These comments have not been moderated. You are encouraged to participate with comments that are relevant to our news stories. You should not post comments that are abusive, threatening, defamatory, misleading or invasive of privacy. For the full terms and conditions for commenting see clause 7 of our Terms and Conditions ‘Participating in Online Communities’. These terms may be updated from time to time, so please read them before posting a comment. Any comment that violates these terms may be removed in its entirety as we do not edit comments. If you wish to complain about a comment please use the "REPORT ABUSE" button or contact the editors.